Monday, 30 January 2017

INSPIRATION OF THE WEEK - Tatsuro Kiuchi (awesome stuff!)


Really like the solid and vast empty space,
somehow balances out the
crowded bottom half (?)
I honestly thought that this illustration is quite
obscure (composition wise). Perhaps it is because
of the lack of definitive line work that
it is hard to exactly see what it is...not sure how
I feel about this composition
  • I was actually first introduced to his illustrations during the Visual Language sessions and I instantly grew obsessed with his practice! I really enjoy looking through his dainty, subdued and rather quiet illustrations. I personally feel that his works aren't content/narrative heavy (quite emotion and atmosphere driven?). But it is the mundane details and subtlety of certain moments that attracted me to his work. 
  • Looking through his various compositions, it made me think that creating simple, symmetrical compositions tend to get rather dull. Sometimes adding variations, or asymmetry adds dynamic. Also the unsettling feeling when seeing an offsetting composition can be interesting.

His roughs

Thursday, 5 January 2017

TATE MODERN TRIP - Too contemporary for my liking

My very first visit to Tate Modern was during the christmas break and I have to say that I was frustrated and unsatisfied


This quote and the gallery itself is too conceptual.

Red
Boris Mikhail

  • I had thought that this series of photographs are very powerful and it indirectly screams 'Communist' due to the red tones. Though what I found interesting is how the photographs are arranged. The first few photographs on the left were of mundane life, gradually showing the 'wonders' of the community, getting much more monochromatic with more violent scenes. Goes to show thought is placed in exhibiting artworks!
I find it ironic how Ai Wei Wei was considered
a controversial artist in China.
AI WEI WEI Documentary























  • He mentioned being oppressed by the government and policies for creating art. I have known art to be a platform of expression, reflection and a response from the artist and towards the world/society. Whereas in his case, he is restricted by authorities (due to the country's political system). I simply find it ironic. Though perhaps there is a certain extent as to where an artist could freely express their opinions.
  • I personally think that visiting galleries gives a lot more intimate experience between yourself and the artwork. Even if you can't touch them, you could tell the details, texture, colours that you can't easily see online or books. 
  • I also seem to notice that people tend to react differently towards artworks showed in galleries. Perhaps it is because people associate galleries to be curated and approved by authorities/professionals. Hence assuming that the artworks showcased are all significant and of different caliber. However, I do find these exhibited artworks to have authenticity/authorship.

Sheela Gowda, Bangalore
It's a tube like-Star Trek-pod mirror (?)























  • There are other similar artworks such as these two -being minimal and conceptual. This is the thing with fine art, where it is very open to interpretation and I personally think that only the artist now the meaning behind it, unless it is deliberately communicated to the audience.
  • Though there are much more ambiguous artworks, for instance Marcel Duchamp's 'Fountain'. In which I saw it and I wasn't sure how I felt (?)
Thoughts
  • I am not too fond of abstract art (conceptual, maybe some). Though, I personally enjoy the simplicity and perhaps it could often be seen in my own practice lately. 
  • Though what makes such artworks peculiar is that it is open to interpretation (I tend to not over-think it though, since it may not mean much). I would say that it is the type of gallery to show that artworks that 'it is art if you think it is'.
  • However, what I quite enjoy about these pieces of work, people are entitled to their own opinions and I find that interesting. Some would adore a white, plain painting, whereas I disagree that it is not art (it isn't engaging nor evoke thought, emotions, aside from annoyance). There are varying perceptions towards art.

Whitworth Art Gallery - Andy Warhol's Exhibition and more!

Andy Warhol
Gun (1981)Acrylic and silk screen
Repent And Sin No More! (1985)
Acrylic and silk screen

A friend thought that it would make a good wallpaper
for her room.

Are you different? (1985-6)
Acrylic paint and silk screen

Electric chairs (1971)
10 silk screens on paper

Thoughts
  • I honestly have only seen Andy Warhol's prints online and never in person, hence I thought that the experience was surreal (never thought about the scale, colour and texture of the work)
  • He clearly focuses on consumerist culture, society and religion, which I thought was quite intriguing. They are themes that are quite loose and sensitive (religion) to a certain extent. It was interesting to see it being exploited in his works.
  • Somehow there is also a sense of cynical humour and criticism towards society, which I thought was what makes his works engaging as it incites the audience to think, respond.  
  • After going through the printing induction, I could somehow relate (to a certain degree) to the process and craft. Particularly for the Electric Chairs he had simply used a single subject, but treated them differently. (I thought that it was pretty interesting.)
Textiles





















  • Saw a few textiles and I thought that they looked very well-crafted, intricate and time consuming to create. Perhaps I find these interesting because of my recent interest in shapes, block-colours and patterns (in other words, OUIL 404)
Christoph Niemann

Saw Christoph Niemann's book in the gift shop.
They were clever, well thought especially the ones
with everyday 3D objects and simple figures.
This quote resonates with me to a certain extent.